Revolution in South Asia

An Internationalist Info Project

Kishenji Supports Demands for Telangana, Gorkhaland states

Posted by Ka Frank on December 14, 2009

The central government recently announced that Telangana in Andhra Pradesh would become a new state, but it is beginning to backtrack. The Telangana area has a rich history of revolutionary struggle, going back to the early 1950s and up to the present.  The CPI (Maoist) and its predecessor organization in Andhra Pradesh, the CPI ML (People’s War), have historically supported this demand, and is now supporting the demand for Gorkhaland in far northern West Bengal, where there is a large Nepali-speaking population.

Hyderabad is part of Telangana: Kishenji

Indian Express, December 14, 2009

Maoist leader Kishenji has said Hyderabad is an integral part of the Telangana region and the city should be made the capital of the new state when it comes into being.  “Hyderabad is a part of Telangana and will stay so. There is no question of disassociating Hyderabad from Telangana,”

Kishenji, who hails from the region, which has a substantial Naxal presence, said over phone from an undisclosed location on Saturday evening. Asked why there was so much controversy over Hyderabad, Kishenji said: “It is because of some retired and serving bureaucrats who own huge chunks of land in the Greater Hyderabad region.” “Nearly 40,000 acres of land, a large portion of which have vineyards, are in the hands of some retired and present bureaucrats,” Kishenji said.

The Maoist leader expressed support for the creation of Telangana and accused the Congress of “depriving” people of the region of their legitimate rights by “backtracking” from its move to bifurcate Andhra Pradesh.

Kishenji alleged the Congress does not want to create a separate state of Telangana and is therefore creating disturbances in the state. This is not the first time the Congress is going back on its word, the Maoist leader said, adding: “It had denied the people of Vidarbha a separate state earlier.”

Maoists demand autonomy for three Bengal districts

Yahoo India, December 12, 2009

Kolkata:  A demand for autonomy for three tribal-dominated districts of West Midnapore, Bankura and Purulia in West Bengal was today made by a top Maoist leader, who also justified the Gorkhaland statehood issue. “We demand autonomy for the three districts on the lines of the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council,” Maoist leader Kishenji told PTI from an undisclosed location.

He alleged that the West Bengal government had denied the legitimate rights of the people of the districts. “We demand autonomy to protect the language, culture and religious beliefs of tribals.”

Asked if he meant statehood, he replied, “the people of the three districts are not yet prepared for statehood.”  Queried if it was part of the demand for a ”greater Jharkhand”, Kishenji said, “That demand is no longer relevant.”

The scenario has changed. “Moreover the formation of Jharkhand has not solved any problem. Going forward with the ”greater Jharkhand” demand will not solve the problem of tribals,” he said.

Kisenji, however, supported the demand for Gorkhaland in Darjeeling stating that it was “legitimate”. “It is the oldest demand for a separate state. They should be allowed a separate state to focus on their development as the state government has neglected the tea and tourism industry there,” Kishenji claimed.

General strike in Darjeeling for separate ‘Gorkhaland’

Nepal News, December 14, 2009

The Gorkha Janamukti Morcha (GJM), agitating for separate Gorkhaland state in West Bengal, India, has called for four-day general strike to pressurise the central government to meet its demand.

The general strike, called shortly after the central government announced to initiate institution of Telengana state, from Monday has affected the normal life in Darjeeling and surrounding towns. All government offices, schools and transport service within the proposed Gorkhaland state have been shut. Local cities experienced large demonstrations on Sunday evening.

Nepalis living in Darjeeling and Kalimpong areas have returned home on Sunday ahead of the shut down strike. The strike affected the border markets in Nepal as well. Majority of the customers for the border markets Pashupatinagar, Manebhanjyang come from across the border.

The agitating group and the central government are scheduled to sit for talks next week to discuss the demand for separate state for Nepali-speaking population. The GJM said the strike will put additional pressure on the central government.

4 Responses to “Kishenji Supports Demands for Telangana, Gorkhaland states”

  1. Ka Frank said

    More on the CPI (Maoist)’s views on the struggles of the oppressed nationality groups in India:

    Maoists look to build links with separatists
    Hindustan Times, Dec 13, 2009

    The Maoists are planning to build a network with the separatist groups of India, the focus being on those operating in the Northeast and Jammu & Kashmir (J&K). Among the groups the Maoists support are United Liberation Front of Asom, National Socialist Council of Nagaland, Tripura National Volunteers, and many J&K separatist outfits.

    “To make the Maoist movement more effective, better coordination with other separatist groups working in the Northeast and Kashmir is of paramount importance,” said Koteshwar Rao alias Kishenji, a politburo member of the banned CPI (Maoist).

    The Maoists also support statehood demands in Vidharbha (Maharashtra), Telangana (AP), Coorg (Karnataka) and Gorkhaland (Bengal).

    A coordination committee comprising members from each of the separatist groups will be set up. Rao said the organisation was in touch with Northeast rebel groups to achieve “sovereignty for the people of Asom, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram and surrounding areas”.

  2. but are those separatists groups mentioned in any way leftwing or progressive … in several cases, I have severe doubts and the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend

  3. nando said

    Entdinglichung:

    You raise a very important question and add the important point that not “every enemy of my enemy” is my ally.

    This is a sharp question with the Indian Maoists who have tended (imho)to somewhat exaggerate the “objectively” progressive character of forces fighting major oppressors (this involves for example an assessment of islamic rightwing forces around the world.)

    However, in the case of separatist groups like this, I think it is also valuable to mention some things:

    1) What their politics are today can change tomorrow — especially if they start operating in the context of, and in alliance with, a consciously communist force.

    2) In many ways the demands of these forces (and the lifting of national oppression within India) can probably only be resolved in a positive in th3e context of socialist revolution — and so there is a material basis for these oppressed peoples grasping the promise of the New Democratic united front.

    3) Part of the socialist revolution involves upholding the right of self-determination of oppressed peoples — and in the context of India, making this part of the New Democratic process can, possibly, mobilize a great deal of struggle among the people against very real oppression.

    IN short, such alliances and openings may be quite positive beyond a simple look at today’s scorecard and political labels.

  4. building alliances with forces involved in e.g. in communalist violence can severely damage the credibility of revolutionaries and the Jihadist in J&K pampered by the Pakistani ISI or the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) which “converts” people at Gunpoint to Christianity are simply reactionaries … as far as I know, most of the separatist groups in Manipur like UNLF, PLA or PREPAK are relatively decent

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: